| |
| Mehr Töchter, mehr Fachleute - Solide Zahlen trotz weltweiter Krisen - Aucotec expandiert weiter |
Autor(16237)
|
Thema: Formula Attribute Question about Pin's destinations (1453 mal gelesen)
|
sustedu Mitglied
Beiträge: 9 Registriert: 17.08.2013
|
erstellt am: 30. Nov. 2014 15:22 <-- editieren / zitieren --> Unities abgeben:
Hi Fask & Every Friends ! I want create a formula attribute for Pin,to show Pin's destinations information in device symble or in worksheets. My way is like this,Pin-->associated Wire-->Wire's destinations(destination1 & destination2). My formula attribute is similar to: [+R-3;R1104;A**;]. A** is some attributes likes Rb108;AR;Rb109;AR; But,the problem's that the associated Wire's destinations is not equel to pin's destinations,Especially the Pin may associated more than 2 wires. Pin's wire destinations informaiton must exclude the Pin itself,How can I solve this problem ? Please give me an idea! ------------------ EngineeringBase 6.3.3 Eine Antwort auf diesen Beitrag verfassen (mit Zitat/Zitat des Beitrags) IP |
ismo Mitglied
Beiträge: 97 Registriert: 20.11.2011
|
erstellt am: 29. Dez. 2014 14:58 <-- editieren / zitieren --> Unities abgeben: Nur für sustedu
I would try to do it with a condition in the Formula comparing the Parent of the Wire Target with something you know (like filtering for a certain kind of device or pin type). This will then however only work for special types of worksheets and not in common. For symbols in drawings, i think your problem is solved with the answer in the earlier threadQuerverweis, however i did not yet understand how that formula works so only guess it needs a shape on a drawing and does not solve your problem with the worksheet - we need someone with better understanding of the Formulas to help you here. Eine Antwort auf diesen Beitrag verfassen (mit Zitat/Zitat des Beitrags) IP |
sustedu Mitglied
Beiträge: 9 Registriert: 17.08.2013
|
erstellt am: 31. Dez. 2014 04:28 <-- editieren / zitieren --> Unities abgeben:
Hi ismo. Thank you very much! As your reminder,I tested the Bodo_M's formula attribute. It's useful in the wire symbol,but it's complicated. And ,It's not the way to solve my problems. TKS!! ------------------ EngineeringBase 6.3.3 Eine Antwort auf diesen Beitrag verfassen (mit Zitat/Zitat des Beitrags) IP |
ismo Mitglied
Beiträge: 97 Registriert: 20.11.2011
|
erstellt am: 31. Dez. 2014 12:21 <-- editieren / zitieren --> Unities abgeben: Nur für sustedu
I read your question again, and you're correct, its much easier in your case. Starting from the Pin, you can just navigate via the Wire to get the other side. The issue you have is with R1104 which addresses both Destinatinons of the Wire, you want to only consider R109 or R108 respectively: [R109;Rb108;Ar;][R108;Rb109;Ar;] should solve your problem! Eine Antwort auf diesen Beitrag verfassen (mit Zitat/Zitat des Beitrags) IP |
sustedu Mitglied
Beiträge: 9 Registriert: 17.08.2013
|
erstellt am: 31. Dez. 2014 14:46 <-- editieren / zitieren --> Unities abgeben:
Hi ismo. Thank you again! Your formula attribute is very useful. But I am not good understand the different between the R108 & Rb108. TKS you ALL. -------- http://ww3.cad.de/foren/ubb/Forum505/HTML/000300.shtml As the URL above what you provide. Do your have a better way to display the wire's destinations in the potential symbols "Cross-Reference Source" or "Cross-Reference Target". Is it possible add a formula attribute into the potential symbols to achieve this ? ------------------ EngineeringBase 6.3.3 Eine Antwort auf diesen Beitrag verfassen (mit Zitat/Zitat des Beitrags) IP |
ismo Mitglied
Beiträge: 97 Registriert: 20.11.2011
|
erstellt am: 01. Jan. 2015 10:40 <-- editieren / zitieren --> Unities abgeben: Nur für sustedu
I only know what is documented in the EB Webhelp (via the EB Help Menu, then under "EB-Developer Help"). "R" accesses the "target association" and "Rb" the "source association". For the Wire to Pin Association, target is from the Pin to the Wire and source is from Wire to Pin (i always found this by trial and error). I cannot really help you with the Potentials, because i never used them until now, however i know there is no concept of Destination 1 / 2 with Potentials, it's more like a bus connection and it can be left to the Electrician to choose which Pins he wants to connect in what order ?! Eine Antwort auf diesen Beitrag verfassen (mit Zitat/Zitat des Beitrags) IP |
sustedu Mitglied
Beiträge: 9 Registriert: 17.08.2013
|
erstellt am: 01. Jan. 2015 14:27 <-- editieren / zitieren --> Unities abgeben:
Hi ismo. TKS for you Explanations. Because of the language, I could not fully understand the EB-Developer Help manual in the web. In my opinion, if I setted the forced wiring symbol in every cross wiring point, the wire's destination information must be unique. In the EB,the symbol "Cross-Reference Source/Target" are the interupte(break off) symbol for diagram wiring. So, I want find a easy way to display the Cross-Reference symbol's association object (the wire's opposite destination). The picture include a diagram sheet in E3 software,and EB's symbol(According to your help,I have used the formual attribute in wire symbol). I want use only one symbol(potential symbol) to finish this purpose. TKS again !!! ------------------ EngineeringBase 6.3.3 Eine Antwort auf diesen Beitrag verfassen (mit Zitat/Zitat des Beitrags) IP |