Hallo Ralf und Felix
Ich habe von meinen support diese text bekommen :
NX Design
All Platforms
SYMPTOM/PROBLEM
---------------
In NX4, Datum Planes are created in a shaded display with 70% Translucency by
default. Can this shaded display be controlled?
SOLUTION/WORKAROUND
-------------------
It may by going to 'Preferences-> Visualization Performance-> General-> Disable
Plane Translucency'. The customer default is found by going to 'File->
Utilities-> Customer Defaults-> Gateway-> Visualization-> Performance-> Disable
Plane Translucency'.
The option is also documented:
Disable Plane Translucency
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Controls whether datum planes are displayed with translucency. If the option
is turned off, and if the view rendering style is not Static Wireframe, the
datum plane is filled with translucency. If the option is turned on, or if the
view rendering style is Static Wireframe, only the perimeter of the datum
plane is displayed.
Display performance can be degraded if many translucent datum planes are
displayed. Turn on this option if performance is unsatisfactory while
translucent datum planes are displayed.
Disable Plane Translucency is a session option, so it applies to view in all
parts in the session. The system does not save the Disable Plane Translucency
setting, but for each session initializes the setting according to a customer
default.
---------------------end of documentation-------------------------------------
Und wie Ich dieses verstehe :
"If the option
is turned off, and if the view rendering style is not Static Wireframe, the
datum plane is filled with translucency. If the option is turned on, or if the
view rendering style is Static Wireframe, only the perimeter of the datum
plane is displayed."
Dann muss es in NX7.5 ein fehler sein, das die datum planes bei static wireframe views noch "shaded" sind...
Ich habe meinen support gebieten, zu untersuchen ob diese ein fehler sind..
Jan
------------------
MFG
Jan Hansen
Sønderborg , Dänemark
Eine Antwort auf diesen Beitrag verfassen (mit Zitat/Zitat des Beitrags) IP