|
Autor
|
Thema: Coaxial rotating cylinders (1475 mal gelesen)
|
Xiana Mitglied phD student
 Beiträge: 1 Registriert: 29.05.2007
|
erstellt am: 29. Mai. 2007 17:21 <-- editieren / zitieren --> Unities abgeben:         
Hi, I am simulating the flow between 2 rotating coaxial cylinders with radius of 0,25 and 0,20 m. I´ve defined my inlet, a ring at the bottom of the anular space, like a velocity inlet with 1m/s in axial direction, the outlet, a ring at the top, like a pressure outlet and the fluid like a reference frame which rotates at 1000rpm. I´ve used the Reynolds Stress Model to model the turbulence but I still have a lot of problems to get a converged solution. The residuals remain high and with oscillations, specially the continuity, because ich have a lot of reversed flow and the balance of mass flow doesn´t agree. Can anyone help me to loose this problem?! Thank you very much Xiana Eine Antwort auf diesen Beitrag verfassen (mit Zitat/Zitat des Beitrags) IP |

| | Cloud Infrastructure & Network Operations Engineer (m/f/d) - SCI | NTT DATA is a $30+ billion business and technology services leader, serving 75% of the Fortune Global 100. We are committed to accelerating client success and positively impacting society through responsible innovation. We are one of the world's leading AI and digital infrastructure providers, with unmatched capabilities in enterprise-scale AI, cloud, security, connectivity, data centers and application services.... | | Anzeige ansehen | Feste Anstellung |
|
Ulrich Heck Moderator OpenFOAM Tool Entwicklung
 
 Beiträge: 291 Registriert: 08.09.2003 CastNet (DHCAE Tools) OpenFOAM CalculiX
|
erstellt am: 30. Mai. 2007 08:38 <-- editieren / zitieren --> Unities abgeben:          Nur für Xiana
Hi Xiana, is there a special reason to use the Reynolds-Stress model? The turbulence seems to be almost caused by the shear conditions and if your flow is almost axial than other turbulence models (such as realizable k-eps) should work as well and run more stable. Of course if you have large swirls (as in cyclones) you have to use Reynolds-Stress. Maybe there is no need to use the reference frame model. You can also define a rotating wall by applying the angular velocity on the wall. I sometimes make the experience that the solver has problems to converge, when the pressure outlet isn't on a physical isobaric surface, meaning that there is a pressure gradient in the outlet. Maybe you can arrange the outlet surface, that it is almost isobaric. Maybe you should consider as well another initialization of the solution. I hope this helps Ulrich
------------------ Dr.-Ing. Ulrich Heck ulrich_heck@dhcae.de http://www.dhcae.de Eine Antwort auf diesen Beitrag verfassen (mit Zitat/Zitat des Beitrags) IP |
| Anzeige.:
Anzeige: (Infos zum Werbeplatz >>)
 |