1 Abaqus 6.11-1 Date 04-Nov-2011 Time 15:07:35 For use by Volkswagenwerk AG under license from Dassault Systemes or its subsidiary. STEP 1 INCREMENT 1 STEP TIME 0.00 S T E P 1 C O U P L E D T H E R M A L - E L E C T R I C A L - S T R U C T U R A L A N A L Y S I S STEADY STATE ANALYSIS AUTOMATIC TIME CONTROL WITH - A SUGGESTED INITIAL TIME INCREMENT OF 1.000E-02 AND A TOTAL TIME PERIOD OF 0.800 THE MINIMUM TIME INCREMENT ALLOWED IS 8.000E-06 THE MAXIMUM TIME INCREMENT ALLOWED IS 0.800 CREEP AND SWELLING EFFECTS ARE OMITTED IN THIS STEP CREEP AND SWELLING EFFECTS WILL BE IGNORED. CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE PARAMETERS FOR FORCE CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL FORCE FOR A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 5.000E-03 CRITERION FOR DISP. CORRECTION IN A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 1.000E-02 INITIAL VALUE OF TIME AVERAGE FORCE 1.000E-02 AVERAGE FORCE IS TIME AVERAGE FORCE ALTERNATE CRIT. FOR RESIDUAL FORCE FOR A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 2.000E-02 CRITERION FOR ZERO FORCE RELATIVE TO TIME AVRG. FORCE 1.000E-05 CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL FORCE WHEN THERE IS ZERO FLUX 1.000E-05 CRITERION FOR DISP. CORRECTION WHEN THERE IS ZERO FLUX 1.000E-03 CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL FORCE FOR A LINEAR INCREMENT 1.000E-08 FIELD CONVERSION RATIO 1.00 CRITERION FOR ZERO FORCE REL. TO TIME AVRG. MAX. FORCE 1.000E-05 CRITERION FOR ZERO DISP. RELATIVE TO CHARACTERISTIC LENGTH 1.000E-08 CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE PARAMETERS FOR HEAT FLUX CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL HEAT FLUX FOR A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 5.000E-03 CRITERION FOR TEMP. CORRECTION IN A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 1.000E-02 INITIAL VALUE OF TIME AVERAGE HEAT FLUX 1.000E-02 AVERAGE HEAT FLUX IS TIME AVERAGE HEAT FLUX ALTERNATE CRIT. FOR RESIDUAL HEAT FLUX FOR A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 2.000E-02 CRITERION FOR ZERO HEAT FLUX RELATIVE TO TIME AVRG. HEAT FLUX 1.000E-05 CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL HEAT FLUX WHEN THERE IS ZERO FLUX 1.000E-05 CRITERION FOR TEMP. CORRECTION WHEN THERE IS ZERO FLUX 1.000E-03 CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL HEAT FLUX FOR A LINEAR INCREMENT 1.000E-08 FIELD CONVERSION RATIO 1.00 CRITERION FOR ZERO HEAT FLUX REL. TO TIME AVRG. MAX. HEAT FLUX 1.000E-05 CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE PARAMETERS FOR CURRENT CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL CURRENT FOR A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 5.000E-03 CRITERION FOR E. POT. CORRECTION IN A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 1.000E-02 INITIAL VALUE OF TIME AVERAGE CURRENT 1.000E-02 AVERAGE CURRENT IS TIME AVERAGE CURRENT ALTERNATE CRIT. FOR RESIDUAL CURRENT FOR A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 2.000E-02 CRITERION FOR ZERO CURRENT RELATIVE TO TIME AVRG. CURRENT 1.000E-05 CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL CURRENT WHEN THERE IS ZERO FLUX 1.000E-05 CRITERION FOR E. POT. CORRECTION WHEN THERE IS ZERO FLUX 1.000E-03 CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL CURRENT FOR A LINEAR INCREMENT 1.000E-08 FIELD CONVERSION RATIO 1.00 CRITERION FOR ZERO CURRENT REL. TO TIME AVRG. MAX. CURRENT 1.000E-05 VOLUMETRIC STRAIN COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR HYBRID SOLIDS 1.000E-05 AXIAL STRAIN COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR HYBRID BEAMS 1.000E-05 TRANS. SHEAR STRAIN COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR HYBRID BEAMS 1.000E-05 SOFT CONTACT CONSTRAINT COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR P>P0 5.000E-03 SOFT CONTACT CONSTRAINT COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR P=0.0 0.100 CONTACT FORCE ERROR TOLERANCE FOR CONVERT SDI=YES 1.00 DISPLACEMENT COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR DCOUP ELEMENTS 1.000E-05 ROTATION COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR DCOUP ELEMENTS 1.000E-05 EQUILIBRIUM WILL BE CHECKED FOR SEVERE DISCONTINUITY ITERATIONS TIME INCREMENTATION CONTROL PARAMETERS: FIRST EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION FOR CONSECUTIVE DIVERGENCE CHECK 4 EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION AT WHICH LOG. CONVERGENCE RATE CHECK BEGINS 8 EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION AFTER WHICH ALTERNATE RESIDUAL IS USED 9 MAXIMUM EQUILIBRIUM ITERATIONS ALLOWED 16 EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION COUNT FOR CUT-BACK IN NEXT INCREMENT 10 MAXIMUM EQUILIB. ITERS IN TWO INCREMENTS FOR TIME INCREMENT INCREASE 4 MAXIMUM ITERATIONS FOR SEVERE DISCONTINUITIES 50 MAXIMUM CUT-BACKS ALLOWED IN AN INCREMENT 5 MAXIMUM DISCON. ITERS IN TWO INCREMENTS FOR TIME INCREMENT INCREASE 50 MAXIMUM CONTACT AUGMENTATIONS FOR *SURFACE BEHAVIOR,AUGMENTED LAGRANGE 6 CUT-BACK FACTOR AFTER DIVERGENCE 0.2500 CUT-BACK FACTOR FOR TOO SLOW CONVERGENCE 0.5000 CUT-BACK FACTOR AFTER TOO MANY EQUILIBRIUM ITERATIONS 0.7500 CUT-BACK FACTOR AFTER TOO MANY SEVERE DISCONTINUITY ITERATIONS 0.2500 CUT-BACK FACTOR AFTER PROBLEMS IN ELEMENT ASSEMBLY 0.2500 INCREASE FACTOR AFTER TWO INCREMENTS THAT CONVERGE QUICKLY 1.500 MAX. TIME INCREMENT INCREASE FACTOR ALLOWED 1.500 MAX. TIME INCREMENT INCREASE FACTOR ALLOWED (DYNAMICS) 1.250 MAX. TIME INCREMENT INCREASE FACTOR ALLOWED (DIFFUSION) 2.000 MINIMUM TIME INCREMENT RATIO FOR EXTRAPOLATION TO OCCUR 0.1000 MAX. RATIO OF TIME INCREMENT TO STABILITY LIMIT 1.000 FRACTION OF STABILITY LIMIT FOR NEW TIME INCREMENT 0.9500 TIME INCREMENT INCREASE FACTOR BEFORE A TIME POINT 1.000 CONTACT CONTROLS APPLIED TO ALL CONTACT PAIRS: GLOBAL STABILIZATION CONTROL IS NOT USED RELATIVE PENETRATION TOLERANCE FOR AUGMENTED LAGRANGE CONTACT: FINITE-SLIDING SURFACE-TO-SURFACE 5.000E-02 OTHERWISE 1.000E-03 PRINT OF INCREMENT NUMBER, TIME, ETC., EVERY 1 INCREMENTS RESTART FILE WILL BE WRITTEN EVERY 999 INCREMENTS THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF INCREMENTS IN THIS STEP IS 1000 LARGE DISPLACEMENT THEORY WILL BE USED UNSYMMETRIC MATRIX STORAGE AND SOLUTION WILL BE USED LINEAR EXTRAPOLATION WILL BE USED CHARACTERISTIC ELEMENT LENGTH 0.639 DETAILS REGARDING ACTUAL SOLUTION WAVEFRONT REQUESTED DETAILED OUTPUT OF DIAGNOSTICS TO DATABASE REQUESTED PRINT OF INCREMENT NUMBER, TIME, ETC., TO THE MESSAGE FILE EVERY 1 INCREMENTS ELEMENT OPERATIONS WILL BE CARRIED OUT IN PARALLEL USING 6 PROCESSORS PARALLEL CONTACT TRACKING ENABLED EQUATIONS ARE BEING REORDERED TO MINIMIZE WAVEFRONT COLLECTING MODEL CONSTRAINT INFORMATION FOR OVERCONSTRAINT CHECKS COLLECTING STEP CONSTRAINT INFORMATION FOR OVERCONSTRAINT CHECKS INCREMENT 1 STARTS. ATTEMPT NUMBER 1, TIME INCREMENT 1.000E-02 INITIAL ELEMENT LOAD BALANCE COMPUTE NODE 1 PROCESS NUMBER OF ELEMENTS 1 3584 2 3696 3 3072 4 3840 5 3536 6 3584 ***WARNING: THERE ARE 2 UNCONNECTED REGIONS IN THE MODEL. NUMBER OF EQUATIONS = 99750 NUMBER OF FLOATING PT. OPERATIONS = 5.20E+11 USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 6 PROCESSORS CHECK POINT START OF SOLVER CHECK POINT END OF SOLVER ELAPSED USER TIME (SEC) = 72.430 ELAPSED SYSTEM TIME (SEC) = 0.58000 ELAPSED TOTAL CPU TIME (SEC) = 73.010 ELAPSED WALLCLOCK TIME (SEC) = 12 ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 3 D.O.F. 3 RATIO = 71.3491E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 3 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 52.5405E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 10053 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 8.81167E+12. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 10053 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 76.9388E+09 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 1829 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 8.11999E+12. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 1829 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 3.28000E+12. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 18203 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 35.2803E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 18203 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 573.567E+12 . ***WARNING: DISPLACEMENT INCREMENT FOR CONTACT IS TOO BIG. INCREMENT 1 STARTS. ATTEMPT NUMBER 2, TIME INCREMENT 2.500E-03 INITIAL ELEMENT LOAD BALANCE COMPUTE NODE 1 PROCESS NUMBER OF ELEMENTS 1 3536 2 3696 3 3328 4 3584 5 3584 6 3584 NUMBER OF EQUATIONS = 99750 NUMBER OF FLOATING PT. OPERATIONS = 5.20E+11 USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 6 PROCESSORS CHECK POINT START OF SOLVER CHECK POINT END OF SOLVER ELAPSED USER TIME (SEC) = 71.480 ELAPSED SYSTEM TIME (SEC) = 0.39000 ELAPSED TOTAL CPU TIME (SEC) = 71.870 ELAPSED WALLCLOCK TIME (SEC) = 12 ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 18203 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 38.7374E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 18203 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 81.9381E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 10053 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 7.49180E+12. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 10053 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 77.2024E+09 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 1829 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 12.3854E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 1829 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 4.32049E+12. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 3 D.O.F. 3 RATIO = 76.7002E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 3 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 84.9729E+12 . ***WARNING: DISPLACEMENT INCREMENT FOR CONTACT IS TOO BIG. INCREMENT 1 STARTS. ATTEMPT NUMBER 3, TIME INCREMENT 6.250E-04 INITIAL ELEMENT LOAD BALANCE COMPUTE NODE 1 PROCESS NUMBER OF ELEMENTS 1 3584 2 3696 3 3536 4 3584 5 3584 6 3328 NUMBER OF EQUATIONS = 99750 NUMBER OF FLOATING PT. OPERATIONS = 5.20E+11 USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 6 PROCESSORS CHECK POINT START OF SOLVER CHECK POINT END OF SOLVER ELAPSED USER TIME (SEC) = 72.080 ELAPSED SYSTEM TIME (SEC) = 0.17000 ELAPSED TOTAL CPU TIME (SEC) = 72.250 ELAPSED WALLCLOCK TIME (SEC) = 12 ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 18203 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 40.6794E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 18203 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 125.142E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 10053 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 7.38990E+12. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 10053 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 77.0562E+09 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 1829 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 7.70648E+12. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 1829 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 3.91763E+12. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 3 D.O.F. 3 RATIO = 42.4149E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 3 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 79.5700E+12 . ***WARNING: DISPLACEMENT INCREMENT FOR CONTACT IS TOO BIG. INCREMENT 1 STARTS. ATTEMPT NUMBER 4, TIME INCREMENT 1.563E-04 INITIAL ELEMENT LOAD BALANCE COMPUTE NODE 1 PROCESS NUMBER OF ELEMENTS 1 3536 2 3840 3 3584 4 3584 5 3328 6 3440 NUMBER OF EQUATIONS = 99750 NUMBER OF FLOATING PT. OPERATIONS = 5.20E+11 USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 6 PROCESSORS CHECK POINT START OF SOLVER CHECK POINT END OF SOLVER ELAPSED USER TIME (SEC) = 71.580 ELAPSED SYSTEM TIME (SEC) = 0.12000 ELAPSED TOTAL CPU TIME (SEC) = 71.700 ELAPSED WALLCLOCK TIME (SEC) = 12 ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 18203 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 35.3612E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 18203 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 89.9713E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 3 D.O.F. 3 RATIO = 57.5252E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 3 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 112.833E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 10053 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 6.85906E+12. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 10053 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 76.9189E+09 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 1829 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 12.2487E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 1829 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 2.89435E+12. ***WARNING: DISPLACEMENT INCREMENT FOR CONTACT IS TOO BIG. INCREMENT 1 STARTS. ATTEMPT NUMBER 5, TIME INCREMENT 3.906E-05 INITIAL ELEMENT LOAD BALANCE COMPUTE NODE 1 PROCESS NUMBER OF ELEMENTS 1 3584 2 3584 3 3536 4 3584 5 3328 6 3696 NUMBER OF EQUATIONS = 99750 NUMBER OF FLOATING PT. OPERATIONS = 5.20E+11 USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 6 PROCESSORS CHECK POINT START OF SOLVER CHECK POINT END OF SOLVER ELAPSED USER TIME (SEC) = 71.740 ELAPSED SYSTEM TIME (SEC) = 0.22000 ELAPSED TOTAL CPU TIME (SEC) = 71.960 ELAPSED WALLCLOCK TIME (SEC) = 12 ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 18203 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 42.1243E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 18203 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 183.541E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 3 D.O.F. 3 RATIO = 296.904E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 3 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 43.9796E+12 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 10053 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 6.99612E+12. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 10053 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 77.0864E+09 . ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 1829 D.O.F. 9 RATIO = 8.90636E+12. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 1829 D.O.F. 11 RATIO = 3.03859E+12. ***WARNING: DISPLACEMENT INCREMENT FOR CONTACT IS TOO BIG. ***ERROR: TOO MANY ATTEMPTS MADE FOR THIS INCREMENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY: TOTAL OF 1 INCREMENTS 5 CUTBACKS IN AUTOMATIC INCREMENTATION 5 ITERATIONS INCLUDING CONTACT ITERATIONS IF PRESENT 5 PASSES THROUGH THE EQUATION SOLVER OF WHICH 5 INVOLVE MATRIX DECOMPOSITION, INCLUDING 0 DECOMPOSITION(S) OF THE MASS MATRIX 1 REORDERING OF EQUATIONS TO MINIMIZE WAVEFRONT 0 ADDITIONAL RESIDUAL EVALUATIONS FOR LINE SEARCHES 0 ADDITIONAL OPERATOR EVALUATIONS FOR LINE SEARCHES 1 WARNING MESSAGES DURING USER INPUT PROCESSING 46 WARNING MESSAGES DURING ANALYSIS 40 ANALYSIS WARNINGS ARE NUMERICAL PROBLEM MESSAGES 0 ANALYSIS WARNINGS ARE NEGATIVE EIGENVALUE MESSAGES 1 ERROR MESSAGES JOB TIME SUMMARY USER TIME (SEC) = 426.29 SYSTEM TIME (SEC) = 4.3400 TOTAL CPU TIME (SEC) = 430.63 WALLCLOCK TIME (SEC) = 83