1 Abaqus Version 6.8-EF1 Date 09-Jun-2009 Time 08:10:59 For use by HJS-Fahrzeugtechnik GmbH & Co. KG under license from Dassault Systemes or its subsidiary. STEP 1 INCREMENT 1 STEP TIME 0.00 S T E P 1 S T A T I C A N A L Y S I S AUTOMATIC TIME CONTROL WITH - A SUGGESTED INITIAL TIME INCREMENT OF 0.100 AND A TOTAL TIME PERIOD OF 2.00 THE MINIMUM TIME INCREMENT ALLOWED IS 1.000E-05 THE MAXIMUM TIME INCREMENT ALLOWED IS 0.100 LINEAR EQUATION SOLVER TYPE DIRECT SPARSE CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE PARAMETERS FOR FORCE CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL FORCE FOR A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 5.000E-03 CRITERION FOR DISP. CORRECTION IN A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 1.000E-02 INITIAL VALUE OF TIME AVERAGE FORCE 1.000E-02 AVERAGE FORCE IS TIME AVERAGE FORCE ALTERNATE CRIT. FOR RESIDUAL FORCE FOR A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 2.000E-02 CRITERION FOR ZERO FORCE RELATIVE TO TIME AVRG. FORCE 1.000E-05 CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL FORCE WHEN THERE IS ZERO FLUX 1.000E-05 CRITERION FOR DISP. CORRECTION WHEN THERE IS ZERO FLUX 1.000E-03 CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL FORCE FOR A LINEAR INCREMENT 1.000E-08 FIELD CONVERSION RATIO 1.00 CRITERION FOR ZERO FORCE REL. TO TIME AVRG. MAX. FORCE 1.000E-05 CRITERION FOR ZERO DISP. RELATIVE TO CHARACTERISTIC LENGTH 1.000E-08 CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE PARAMETERS FOR MOMENT CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL MOMENT FOR A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 5.000E-03 CRITERION FOR ROTATION CORRECTION IN A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 1.000E-02 INITIAL VALUE OF TIME AVERAGE MOMENT 1.000E-02 AVERAGE MOMENT IS TIME AVERAGE MOMENT ALTERNATE CRIT. FOR RESIDUAL MOMENT FOR A NONLINEAR PROBLEM 2.000E-02 CRITERION FOR ZERO MOMENT RELATIVE TO TIME AVRG. MOMENT 1.000E-05 CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL MOMENT WHEN THERE IS ZERO FLUX 1.000E-05 CRITERION FOR ROTATION CORRECTION WHEN THERE IS ZERO FLUX 1.000E-03 CRITERION FOR RESIDUAL MOMENT FOR A LINEAR INCREMENT 1.000E-08 FIELD CONVERSION RATIO 1.00 CRITERION FOR ZERO MOMENT REL. TO TIME AVRG. MAX. MOMENT 1.000E-05 VOLUMETRIC STRAIN COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR HYBRID SOLIDS 1.000E-05 AXIAL STRAIN COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR HYBRID BEAMS 1.000E-05 TRANS. SHEAR STRAIN COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR HYBRID BEAMS 1.000E-05 SOFT CONTACT CONSTRAINT COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR P>P0 5.000E-03 SOFT CONTACT CONSTRAINT COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR P=0.0 0.100 CONTACT FORCE ERROR TOLERANCE FOR CONVERT SDI=YES 1.00 DISPLACEMENT COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR DCOUP ELEMENTS 1.000E-05 ROTATION COMPATIBILITY TOLERANCE FOR DCOUP ELEMENTS 1.000E-05 EQUILIBRIUM WILL BE CHECKED FOR SEVERE DISCONTINUITY ITERATIONS TIME INCREMENTATION CONTROL PARAMETERS: FIRST EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION FOR CONSECUTIVE DIVERGENCE CHECK 4 EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION AT WHICH LOG. CONVERGENCE RATE CHECK BEGINS 8 EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION AFTER WHICH ALTERNATE RESIDUAL IS USED 9 MAXIMUM EQUILIBRIUM ITERATIONS ALLOWED 16 EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION COUNT FOR CUT-BACK IN NEXT INCREMENT 10 MAXIMUM EQUILIB. ITERS IN TWO INCREMENTS FOR TIME INCREMENT INCREASE 4 MAXIMUM ITERATIONS FOR SEVERE DISCONTINUITIES 50 MAXIMUM CUT-BACKS ALLOWED IN AN INCREMENT 5 MAXIMUM DISCON. ITERS IN TWO INCREMENTS FOR TIME INCREMENT INCREASE 50 MAXIMUM CONTACT AUGMENTATIONS FOR *SURFACE BEHAVIOR,AUGMENTED LAGRANGE 6 CUT-BACK FACTOR AFTER DIVERGENCE 0.2500 CUT-BACK FACTOR FOR TOO SLOW CONVERGENCE 0.5000 CUT-BACK FACTOR AFTER TOO MANY EQUILIBRIUM ITERATIONS 0.7500 CUT-BACK FACTOR AFTER TOO MANY SEVERE DISCONTINUITY ITERATIONS 0.2500 CUT-BACK FACTOR AFTER PROBLEMS IN ELEMENT ASSEMBLY 0.2500 INCREASE FACTOR AFTER TWO INCREMENTS THAT CONVERGE QUICKLY 1.500 MAX. TIME INCREMENT INCREASE FACTOR ALLOWED 1.500 MAX. TIME INCREMENT INCREASE FACTOR ALLOWED (DYNAMICS) 1.250 MAX. TIME INCREMENT INCREASE FACTOR ALLOWED (DIFFUSION) 2.000 MINIMUM TIME INCREMENT RATIO FOR EXTRAPOLATION TO OCCUR 0.1000 MAX. RATIO OF TIME INCREMENT TO STABILITY LIMIT 1.000 FRACTION OF STABILITY LIMIT FOR NEW TIME INCREMENT 0.9500 TIME INCREMENT INCREASE FACTOR BEFORE A TIME POINT 1.000 AUTOMATIC TOLERANCES FOR OVERCLOSURE AND SEPARATION PRESSURE ARE SUPPRESSED GLOBAL STABILIZATION CONTROL IS NOT USED FRICTION IS INCLUDED IN INCREMENT THAT THE CONTACT POINT CLOSES PRINT OF INCREMENT NUMBER, TIME, ETC., EVERY 1 INCREMENTS THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF INCREMENTS IN THIS STEP IS 100 LINEAR EXTRAPOLATION WILL BE USED CHARACTERISTIC ELEMENT LENGTH 4.01 DETAILED OUTPUT OF DIAGNOSTICS TO DATABASE REQUESTED PRINT OF INCREMENT NUMBER, TIME, ETC., TO THE MESSAGE FILE EVERY 1 INCREMENTS ELEMENT OPERATIONS WILL BE CARRIED OUT IN PARALLEL USING 3 PROCESSORS PARALLEL CONTACT TRACKING ENABLED EQUATIONS ARE BEING REORDERED TO MINIMIZE WAVEFRONT COLLECTING MODEL CONSTRAINT INFORMATION FOR OVERCONSTRAINT CHECKS COLLECTING STEP CONSTRAINT INFORMATION FOR OVERCONSTRAINT CHECKS INCREMENT 1 STARTS. ATTEMPT NUMBER 1, TIME INCREMENT 0.100 INITIAL ELEMENT LOAD BALANCE COMPUTE NODE 1 PROCESS NUMBER OF ELEMENTS 1 768 2 617 3 768 USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 9.86634E+009. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.34061E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 4.55004E+011. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 1 AVERAGE FORCE 1.458E-03 TIME AVG. FORCE 1.458E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE 0.139 AT NODE 10897 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 3.384E+07 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 3.384E+07 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 7.190E-04 TIME AVG. MOMENT 7.190E-04 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT 1.38 AT NODE 10898 DOF 6 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION -2.742E+05 AT NODE 8990 DOF 6 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION -2.742E+05 AT NODE 8990 DOF 6 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.50428E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.20273E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 6.47588E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 2 AVERAGE FORCE 6.418E-04 TIME AVG. FORCE 6.418E-04 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -2.471E-02 AT NODE 10898 DOF 3 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 3.287E+07 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 1.541E+07 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 3.416E-04 TIME AVG. MOMENT 3.416E-04 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -0.686 AT NODE 10898 DOF 5 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION -2.728E+05 AT NODE 8991 DOF 6 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 1.388E+05 AT NODE 9373 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 8.69906E+009. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.68579E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 4.60439E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 3 AVERAGE FORCE 4.214E-04 TIME AVG. FORCE 4.214E-04 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -4.243E-02 AT NODE 10898 DOF 3 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 3.485E+07 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 9.573E+06 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 2.579E-04 TIME AVG. MOMENT 2.579E-04 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -0.435 AT NODE 10899 DOF 6 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION -3.018E+05 AT NODE 8989 DOF 6 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 8.097E+04 AT NODE 9540 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.47661E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.03611E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 5.98968E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 4 AVERAGE FORCE 6.183E-04 TIME AVG. FORCE 6.183E-04 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -4.079E-02 AT NODE 10898 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 4.413E+07 AT NODE 8728 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 1.662E+07 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 3.666E-04 TIME AVG. MOMENT 3.666E-04 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT 0.648 AT NODE 10899 DOF 6 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 4.053E+05 AT NODE 9377 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 1.431E+05 AT NODE 9401 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.43287E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.01329E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 4.51097E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 5 AVERAGE FORCE 6.769E-04 TIME AVG. FORCE 6.769E-04 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -3.989E-02 AT NODE 10899 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 5.505E+07 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 1.409E+07 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 4.061E-04 TIME AVG. MOMENT 4.061E-04 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -0.546 AT NODE 10898 DOF 4 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 5.226E+05 AT NODE 9068 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 1.173E+05 AT NODE 9319 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.23306E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.50325E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 8.11177E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 6 AVERAGE FORCE 7.226E-04 TIME AVG. FORCE 7.226E-04 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -4.519E-02 AT NODE 10898 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 6.842E+07 AT NODE 8728 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 1.373E+07 AT NODE 8728 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 4.145E-04 TIME AVG. MOMENT 4.145E-04 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT 0.643 AT NODE 10898 DOF 5 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 6.426E+05 AT NODE 9324 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 1.200E+05 AT NODE 8828 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. ***NOTE: THE SOLUTION APPEARS TO BE DIVERGING. CONVERGENCE IS JUDGED UNLIKELY. INCREMENT 1 STARTS. ATTEMPT NUMBER 2, TIME INCREMENT 2.500E-02 INITIAL ELEMENT LOAD BALANCE COMPUTE NODE 1 PROCESS NUMBER OF ELEMENTS 1 768 2 617 3 768 USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.27719E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.68974E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 5.60823E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 1 AVERAGE FORCE 1.378E-04 TIME AVG. FORCE 1.378E-04 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -8.211E-03 AT NODE 10898 DOF 3 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 3.257E+06 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 3.257E+06 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 6.783E-05 TIME AVG. MOMENT 6.783E-05 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -9.506E-02 AT NODE 10899 DOF 4 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 2.977E+04 AT NODE 9377 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 2.977E+04 AT NODE 9377 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 2.16141E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.95747E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 1.76132E+013. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 2 AVERAGE FORCE 4.818E-02 TIME AVG. FORCE 4.818E-02 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE 4.08 AT NODE 10897 DOF 3 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.162E+09 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 1.162E+09 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 1.844E-02 TIME AVG. MOMENT 1.844E-02 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -25.0 AT NODE 10899 DOF 6 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION -1.211E+07 AT NODE 8924 DOF 5 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION -1.211E+07 AT NODE 8924 DOF 5 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 8.74707E+009. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.2854E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 4.44412E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 3 AVERAGE FORCE 5.071E-03 TIME AVG. FORCE 5.071E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE 0.326 AT NODE 10898 DOF 3 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.163E+09 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 2.321E+06 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 3.652E-03 TIME AVG. MOMENT 3.652E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -8.91 AT NODE 10898 DOF 5 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION -1.210E+07 AT NODE 9492 DOF 5 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 2.038E+04 AT NODE 9373 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.18201E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.04712E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 1.09068E+011. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 4 AVERAGE FORCE 5.078E-03 TIME AVG. FORCE 5.078E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -0.582 AT NODE 10898 DOF 3 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.163E+09 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 3.018E+06 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 3.456E-03 TIME AVG. MOMENT 3.456E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT 7.76 AT NODE 10898 DOF 6 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION -1.210E+07 AT NODE 8914 DOF 5 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 2.784E+04 AT NODE 9371 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 9.00821E+009. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.57243E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 5.69125E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 5 AVERAGE FORCE 5.046E-03 TIME AVG. FORCE 5.046E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE 0.518 AT NODE 10898 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.164E+09 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 2.407E+06 AT NODE 8728 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 3.556E-03 TIME AVG. MOMENT 3.556E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -5.59 AT NODE 10899 DOF 5 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION -1.210E+07 AT NODE 8891 DOF 5 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 2.193E+04 AT NODE 9348 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.03038E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 4.15037E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 4.44579E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 6 AVERAGE FORCE 4.965E-03 TIME AVG. FORCE 4.965E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -0.553 AT NODE 10898 DOF 3 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.163E+09 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 3.048E+06 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 3.594E-03 TIME AVG. MOMENT 3.594E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT 8.04 AT NODE 10898 DOF 4 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION -1.208E+07 AT NODE 8906 DOF 5 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 2.336E+04 AT NODE 9382 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 9.56247E+009. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.36033E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 5.17951E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 7 AVERAGE FORCE 4.916E-03 TIME AVG. FORCE 4.916E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -0.248 AT NODE 10899 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.163E+09 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 2.562E+06 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 3.571E-03 TIME AVG. MOMENT 3.571E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT 10.8 AT NODE 10899 DOF 6 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION -1.207E+07 AT NODE 8770 DOF 5 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 2.152E+04 AT NODE 9383 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.58335E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.76661E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 3.66275E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 8 AVERAGE FORCE 4.827E-03 TIME AVG. FORCE 4.827E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -0.357 AT NODE 10898 DOF 1 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.163E+09 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 4.290E+06 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 3.489E-03 TIME AVG. MOMENT 3.489E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT 3.60 AT NODE 10898 DOF 5 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION -1.205E+07 AT NODE 9410 DOF 5 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 3.614E+04 AT NODE 9366 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 8.33922E+009. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.65863E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 6.07527E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 9 AVERAGE FORCE 4.957E-03 TIME AVG. FORCE 4.957E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE 0.648 AT NODE 10898 DOF 1 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.162E+09 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 2.182E+06 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 3.481E-03 TIME AVG. MOMENT 3.481E-03 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -5.93 AT NODE 10899 DOF 5 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION -1.205E+07 AT NODE 8879 DOF 5 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 1.930E+04 AT NODE 9384 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. ***NOTE: THE SOLUTION APPEARS TO BE DIVERGING. CONVERGENCE IS JUDGED UNLIKELY. INCREMENT 1 STARTS. ATTEMPT NUMBER 3, TIME INCREMENT 6.250E-03 INITIAL ELEMENT LOAD BALANCE COMPUTE NODE 1 PROCESS NUMBER OF ELEMENTS 1 768 2 617 3 768 USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.13689E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.60213E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 5.94012E+011. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 1 AVERAGE FORCE 5.077E-05 TIME AVG. FORCE 5.077E-05 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -2.738E-03 AT NODE 10898 DOF 1 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.132E+06 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 1.132E+06 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 3.224E-05 TIME AVG. MOMENT 3.224E-05 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -4.128E-02 AT NODE 10899 DOF 6 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION -8.879E+03 AT NODE 8989 DOF 6 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION -8.879E+03 AT NODE 8989 DOF 6 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.35393E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.56011E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 7.05789E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 2 AVERAGE FORCE 3.201E-05 TIME AVG. FORCE 3.201E-05 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -1.757E-03 AT NODE 10899 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.591E+06 AT NODE 8728 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 8.781E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 1.843E-05 TIME AVG. MOMENT 1.843E-05 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -3.557E-02 AT NODE 10898 DOF 4 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 1.436E+04 AT NODE 9377 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 7.239E+03 AT NODE 9390 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.15005E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.84432E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 3.25725E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 3 AVERAGE FORCE 3.064E-05 TIME AVG. FORCE 3.064E-05 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -1.369E-03 AT NODE 10898 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 2.300E+06 AT NODE 8728 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 7.117E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 1.712E-05 TIME AVG. MOMENT 1.712E-05 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -1.301E-02 AT NODE 10898 DOF 4 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 2.113E+04 AT NODE 9367 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 6.764E+03 AT NODE 8885 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 9.93375E+009. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.84697E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 2.95065E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 4 AVERAGE FORCE 2.469E-05 TIME AVG. FORCE 2.469E-05 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -2.482E-03 AT NODE 10899 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 2.848E+06 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 7.126E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 1.676E-05 TIME AVG. MOMENT 1.676E-05 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -3.657E-02 AT NODE 10899 DOF 4 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 2.658E+04 AT NODE 9062 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 5.456E+03 AT NODE 8986 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. ***NOTE: THE SOLUTION APPEARS TO BE DIVERGING. CONVERGENCE IS JUDGED UNLIKELY. INCREMENT 1 STARTS. ATTEMPT NUMBER 4, TIME INCREMENT 1.563E-03 INITIAL ELEMENT LOAD BALANCE COMPUTE NODE 1 PROCESS NUMBER OF ELEMENTS 1 768 2 768 3 617 USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 8.36236E+009. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.56996E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 3.4429E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 1 AVERAGE FORCE 4.633E-06 TIME AVG. FORCE 4.633E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -2.100E-04 AT NODE 10898 DOF 3 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.444E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 1.444E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 2.944E-06 TIME AVG. MOMENT 2.944E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -3.859E-03 AT NODE 10898 DOF 5 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 1.172E+03 AT NODE 9063 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 1.172E+03 AT NODE 9063 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.36895E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.6845E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 7.04178E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 2 AVERAGE FORCE 8.882E-06 TIME AVG. FORCE 8.882E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -3.402E-04 AT NODE 10898 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 3.671E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 2.227E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 4.558E-06 TIME AVG. MOMENT 4.558E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -6.651E-03 AT NODE 10898 DOF 4 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 3.153E+03 AT NODE 9377 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 1.981E+03 AT NODE 9377 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.18461E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.41198E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 5.41092E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 3 AVERAGE FORCE 8.921E-06 TIME AVG. FORCE 8.921E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -2.872E-04 AT NODE 10898 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 5.903E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 2.232E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 4.434E-06 TIME AVG. MOMENT 4.434E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT 3.884E-03 AT NODE 10899 DOF 5 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 4.874E+03 AT NODE 9369 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 1.721E+03 AT NODE 9279 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 9.77966E+009. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.96336E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 5.59292E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 4 AVERAGE FORCE 6.535E-06 TIME AVG. FORCE 6.535E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -4.962E-04 AT NODE 10898 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 7.463E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 1.560E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 3.785E-06 TIME AVG. MOMENT 3.785E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -9.074E-03 AT NODE 10898 DOF 4 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 6.327E+03 AT NODE 9369 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 1.453E+03 AT NODE 8893 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. ***NOTE: THE SOLUTION APPEARS TO BE DIVERGING. CONVERGENCE IS JUDGED UNLIKELY. INCREMENT 1 STARTS. ATTEMPT NUMBER 5, TIME INCREMENT 3.906E-04 INITIAL ELEMENT LOAD BALANCE COMPUTE NODE 1 PROCESS NUMBER OF ELEMENTS 1 768 2 617 3 768 USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 9.39831E+009. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.70253E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 3.46363E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 1 AVERAGE FORCE 1.454E-06 TIME AVG. FORCE 1.454E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -6.229E-05 AT NODE 10899 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 4.044E+04 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 4.044E+04 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 7.476E-07 TIME AVG. MOMENT 7.476E-07 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -1.464E-03 AT NODE 10898 DOF 4 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 348. AT NODE 9329 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 348. AT NODE 9329 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.60287E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.48582E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 9.03117E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 2 AVERAGE FORCE 2.773E-06 TIME AVG. FORCE 2.773E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -1.308E-04 AT NODE 10899 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.019E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 6.242E+04 AT NODE 8728 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 1.375E-06 TIME AVG. MOMENT 1.375E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT 3.231E-03 AT NODE 10898 DOF 5 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 937. AT NODE 9367 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 590. AT NODE 9367 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 8.27615E+009. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.94112E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 3.31426E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 3 AVERAGE FORCE 1.519E-06 TIME AVG. FORCE 1.519E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -1.477E-04 AT NODE 10898 DOF 3 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.373E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 3.539E+04 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 8.885E-07 TIME AVG. MOMENT 8.885E-07 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -2.123E-03 AT NODE 10899 DOF 4 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 1.222E+03 AT NODE 9377 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 285. AT NODE 9540 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.10016E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.52207E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 5.84076E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 4 AVERAGE FORCE 2.105E-06 TIME AVG. FORCE 2.105E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -6.394E-05 AT NODE 10898 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 1.812E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 4.388E+04 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 1.100E-06 TIME AVG. MOMENT 1.100E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -1.369E-03 AT NODE 10898 DOF 5 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 1.628E+03 AT NODE 9329 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 406. AT NODE 9308 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.00525E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 1.73143E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 5.42056E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 5 AVERAGE FORCE 1.882E-06 TIME AVG. FORCE 1.882E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -8.888E-05 AT NODE 10898 DOF 3 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 2.257E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 4.453E+04 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 1.148E-06 TIME AVG. MOMENT 1.148E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -1.606E-03 AT NODE 10899 DOF 4 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 1.994E+03 AT NODE 9369 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 365. AT NODE 9285 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.09986E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.66227E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 4.57648E+010. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 6 AVERAGE FORCE 2.083E-06 TIME AVG. FORCE 2.083E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -7.488E-05 AT NODE 10898 DOF 2 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 2.698E+05 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 4.410E+04 AT NODE 8749 DOF 3 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 1.273E-06 TIME AVG. MOMENT 1.273E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -2.236E-03 AT NODE 10898 DOF 4 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 2.399E+03 AT NODE 9329 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION 406. AT NODE 8824 DOF 4 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. USING THE DIRECT SOLVER WITH 3 PROCESSORS ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 4 RATIO = 1.39458E+010. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 5 RATIO = 2.51246E+011. ***WARNING: SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE 8715 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 3.2365E+011. CONVERGENCE CHECKS FOR EQUILIBRIUM ITERATION 7 AVERAGE FORCE 6.773E-06 TIME AVG. FORCE 6.773E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL FORCE -3.412E-04 AT NODE 10898 DOF 1 LARGEST INCREMENT OF DISP. 2.966E+05 AT NODE 8728 DOF 3 LARGEST CORRECTION TO DISP. 1.758E+05 AT NODE 8760 DOF 1 FORCE EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. AVERAGE MOMENT 3.484E-06 TIME AVG. MOMENT 3.484E-06 LARGEST RESIDUAL MOMENT -6.347E-03 AT NODE 10899 DOF 6 LARGEST INCREMENT OF ROTATION 2.539E+03 AT NODE 9507 DOF 4 LARGEST CORRECTION TO ROTATION -1.746E+03 AT NODE 9758 DOF 5 MOMENT EQUILIBRIUM NOT ACHIEVED WITHIN TOLERANCE. ***NOTE: THE SOLUTION APPEARS TO BE DIVERGING. CONVERGENCE IS JUDGED UNLIKELY. ***ERROR: TOO MANY ATTEMPTS MADE FOR THIS INCREMENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY: TOTAL OF 1 INCREMENTS 5 CUTBACKS IN AUTOMATIC INCREMENTATION 30 ITERATIONS INCLUDING CONTACT ITERATIONS IF PRESENT 30 PASSES THROUGH THE EQUATION SOLVER OF WHICH 30 INVOLVE MATRIX DECOMPOSITION, INCLUDING 0 DECOMPOSITION(S) OF THE MASS MATRIX 1 REORDERING OF EQUATIONS TO MINIMIZE WAVEFRONT 0 ADDITIONAL RESIDUAL EVALUATIONS FOR LINE SEARCHES 0 ADDITIONAL OPERATOR EVALUATIONS FOR LINE SEARCHES 173 WARNING MESSAGES DURING USER INPUT PROCESSING 90 WARNING MESSAGES DURING ANALYSIS 90 ANALYSIS WARNINGS ARE NUMERICAL PROBLEM MESSAGES 0 ANALYSIS WARNINGS ARE NEGATIVE EIGENVALUE MESSAGES 1 ERROR MESSAGES JOB TIME SUMMARY USER TIME (SEC) = 9.9000 SYSTEM TIME (SEC) = 1.3000 TOTAL CPU TIME (SEC) = 11.200 WALLCLOCK TIME (SEC) = 7