---

Anybody knows an actual test which compares the performance of different CAD programs like I-deas, NX 2, Solid Edge V15 and Catia V5?

Today we are using I-deas NX and testing Unigraphics NX 2.

When we change to another system the iterative design improvement process on _(complex) 3D objects_ shall be more efficient (quick, easy). The rest of I-deas is very fine.

More detailled information about our problems:
I am not satisfied with the stability and performance of the algorithms of I-deas NX and NX 2 when changing draft angles, rounds, fillets, lofts, ...
Problems arise when the optical design of a part is ready and it is then necessary to change geometry add draft angles, ... for diecasting or plasic injection purposes. In most cases it is necessary to rebuild many of the rounds, fillets, ...

Thank you for hints! (deutsch oder/or english)

Regards
Harald

[Diese Nachricht wurde von Harald Lüling am 02. Mai. 2004 editiert.]

[Diese Nachricht wurde von Harald Lüling am 02. Mai. 2004 editiert.]

Eine Antwort auf diesen Beitrag verfassen (mit Zitat/Zitat des Beitrags) IP